Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 28;18:132. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1557-4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of CEIDCA to two MI-based methods. The core ceRNA network identified by CEIDCA was compared to the ones by SMI and CMI methods (P cutoff < 0.001) with respect to (a) ceRNA triplets (edges) and (b) ceRNAs (nodes). Significance of overlaps was assessed by Fisher’s exact tests. c Computation time for an inference of ~2.76 million putative ceRNA triplets