Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 15;74:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.11.002

Table 2.

Inhibition as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome

B SE (B) t p 95% CI R2 F
Stroop Task
 Stroop Word Score 0.14 5.38***
  Condition 2.53 3.90 0.65 .52 −5.21 – 10.28
  Word t-score −0.06 0.06 −1.03 .31 −0.18 – 0.06
  Condition × word t-score 0.03 0.08 0.33 .74 −0.13 – 0.19
 Stroop Color Score 0.15 5.83***
  Condition 4.09 4.36 0.94 .35 −4.55 – 12.74
  Color t-score −0.07 0.07 −1.06 .29 −0.21 – 0.06
  Condition × color t-score −0.01 0.09 −0.07 .95 −0.19 – 0.18
 Stroop Interference .14 5.52***
  Condition 8.88 6.47 1.37 .17 −3.95 – 21.72
  Interference t-score −0.02 0.09 −0.18 .86 −0.19 – 0.16
  Condition × interference −0.10 0.12 −0.78 .44 −0.34 – 0.15
Go/NoGo Task
 Commission errors 0.14 5.07***
  Condition 4.20 1.29 3.27*** .00 1.65 – 6.75
  Commission errors 0.01 0.04 0.19 .85 −0.07 – 0.09
  Condition × commission errors −0.02 0.06 −0.30 .76 −0.14 – 0.11
 Omission errors 0.14 5.11***
  Condition 4.08 1.10 3.71*** .00 1.90 – 6.26
  Omission errors 0.02 0.05 0.45 .66 −0.08 – 0.12
  Condition × omission errors −0.03 0.10 −0.26 .79 −0.21 – 0.16

Note.

***

p <.001.

Stroop analyses n=104. Go/NoGo analyses n=100.