Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 3;17(3):275–284. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30418-2

Table 2.

Univariable analysis of risk factors associated with multidrug-resistance in genomic clusters (n=299)*

Characteristics Genomic clusters by whole-genome sequencing
Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Non-cluster (n=203) Cluster (n=96)
Sex
Male 65 (32.0) 21 (21.9) 1.00
Female 138 (68.0) 75 (78.1) 1.68 (0.95-2.97) 0.07
Age, years
15-34 95 (46.8) 28 (29.2) 1.00
35-44 32 (15.8) 15 (15.6) 1.59 (0.75-3.37) 0.18
45-64 60 (29.5) 38 (39.6) 2.15 (1.18-3.90) 0.009
≥ 65 16 (7.9) 15 (15.6) 3.18 (1.36-7.41) 0.004
Previous treatment
No 106 (52.2) 55 (57.3) 1.00
Yes 97 (47.8) 41 (42.7) 0.81 (0.49-1.33) 0.41
Diagnostic delay
< Two months 175 (86.2) 70 (72.9) 1.00
≥ Two months 28 (13.8) 26 (27.1) 2.20 (1.19-4.07) 0.005
Sputum smear positive
No 37 (18.2) 16 (16.7) 1.00
Yes 164 (80.8) 80 (83.3) 1.13 (0.59-2.15) 0.58
Unknown 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0) - - -
Treatment outcomes
Cured/Treatment completed 119 (58.6) 58 (60.4) 1.00
Treatment Failure 11 (5.4) 6 (6.2) 1.11 (0.39-3.18) 0.83
Default/Moved/Lost 34 (16.8) 11 (11.5) 0.66 (0.31-1.41) 0.28
Died 21 (10.3) 10 (10.4) 0.98 (0.43-2.21) 0.96
Still on treatment/Unknown 18 (8.9) 11 (11.5) 1.25 (0.55-2.83) 0.58
Beijing strains
No 27 (13.3) 6 (6.3) 1.00
Yes 176 (86.7) 90 (93.7) 2.30 (0.91-5.81) 0.06
Cavitary disease (n=296)
No 97/201 (48.3) 53/95 (55.8) 1.00
Yes 104/201 (51.7) 42/95 (44.2) 0.74 (0.45-1.21) 0.22

Data are n (%) unless otherwise specifi ed. OR=odds ratio.

*

Data were available for 299 patients.

Comparison between genomically clustered and non-clustered multidrug-resistant tuberculosis cases.

Cavitary disease was based on the presence or absence of a cavity on the chest radiograph at the time of diagnosis.