Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 9;32(3):256–261. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3858-0

Table 2.

Medication Adherence During Intervention and Follow-Up, LDL Change from Baseline to 6 Months, and Survey Changes from Baseline to 3 Months and from 4 to 6 Months

Control (n = 36) Individual feedback (n = 36) Feedback + Partner (n = 54)
Intervention (0–3 months) adherence rate 0.67 (0.60, 0.75) 0.89 (0.81, 0.97) 0.86 (0.80, 0.92)
p-value* < 0.001 0.001
Follow-up (4–6 months) adherence rate 0.54 (0.43, 0.66) 0.60 (0.49, 0.72) 0.52 (0.42, 0.61)
p-value* 0.75 0.95
Change in LDL at 6 months −9.14 (−19.47, 1.18) −5.01 (−15.49, 5.48) −4.60 (−13.55, 4.35)
p-value* 0.85 0.79
Change in PAM level, baseline to 3 months 0.12 (−0.21, 0.45) 0.23 (−0 01, 0 55) 0.27 (0.01, 0.53)
p-value* 0.88 0.77
Change in PAM level, 4 to 6 months −0.14 (−0.43, 0.15) −0.27 (−0.56, 0.02) −0.32 (−0.55, −0.08)
p-value* 0.82 0.63
Change in MSPSS level, baseline to 3 months −0.06 (−0.28, 0.15) −0.09 (−0.31, 0.13) −0.01 (−0.18, 0.17)
p-value* 0.98 0.92
Change in MSPSS level, 4 to 6 months 0.16 (−0.03, 0.35) −0.01 (−0.20, 0.18) 0.11 (−0.06, 0.28)
p-value* 0.41 0.89

LDL low-density lipoprotein, PAM Patient Activation Measure, MSPSS Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support *p-values reflect comparisons with control group, and are adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Tukey method. Differences between intervention arms were not significant.PAM level range: 1 to 4MSPSS level range: 1 to 3