Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 15;2017:4716792. doi: 10.1155/2017/4716792

Table 2.

Post hoc comparison by paired t-test on MEP amplitudes and IHI before and after acupuncture.

Time 1 Time 2 t value P value
MEP amplitudes (mV)
Left FDI
  90% RMT 0.218 ± 0.099 0.137 ± 0.091 2.616 0.028
  100% RMT 0.658 ± 0.229 0.405 ± 0.221 3.333 0.009
  110% RMT 1.485 ± 0.526 0.837 ± 0.359 4.407 0.002
  130% RMT 2.129 ± 0.565 1.509 ± 0.494 4.159 0.002
  150% RMT 2.372 ± 0.620 1.732 ± 0.666 4.738 0.001
Right FDI
  90% RMT 0.124 ± 0.069 0.189 ± 0.108 −1.648 0.134
  100% RMT 0.317 ± 0.145 0.812 ± 0.309 −4.169 0.002
  110% RMT 0.796 ± 0.376 1.683 ± 0.744 −3.781 0.004
  130% RMT 1.714 ± 0.859 2.587 ± 0.892 −3.769 0.004
  150% RMT 2.323 ± 1.198 3.031 ± 1.046 −2.859 0.019
IHI (%)
 100% RMT 88.281 ± 15.831 106.079 ± 11.508 −3.556 0.006
 110% RMT 88.497 ± 15.868 102.046 ± 19.423 −1.945 0.084
 130% RMT 69.545 ± 20.314 92.743 ± 17.763 −3.826 0.004
 150% RMT 55.937 ± 20.865 77.705 ± 19.524 −4.410 0.002

MEP: motor-evoked potential; IHI: interhemispheric inhibition; FDI: first dorsal interosseous.

Time 1. Before acupuncture intervention.

Time 2. 10 min after the removal of all needles.

P < 0.01 for MEP analysis and P < 0.0125 for IHI, as Bonferroni's post hoc adjusted significant level.