Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;16(9):713–719. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7054

Table 1.

Evidence supporting flow against pressure as the causative factor of common hypertensive complications

Against pressure as the dominant factor For flow as the dominant factor
Pressure changes whereas organ flow is constant
Hydrostatic pressure
 Effects of gravity Involvement of the brain (the lowest pressure) Involvement of organs with higher flow
 Positional change No effect of HSP Target organ flow is unchanged
 No gravity No effect of HSP Target organ flow is unchanged
High BP in physiologic conditions
 Exercise No effect of exercise induced BP increase Target organ flow is unchanged
 Comparative physiology No effect of HT in the giraffe Target organ flow is unchanged (?)
Pressure is constant whereas organ flow may be changing
 Hemodynamic studies Vascular changes predating increase in BP Increased flow as the possible earliest finding
 Residual risk Arbitrary definition of HT
 Resistant hypertension Natural BP > treated BP for the same level
Significant residual risk in treated HT
Resistance to treatment > achieved BP level
Other
Type of damage Less directly pressure-related complications Dominance of endothelial complications

BP - blood pressure; HSP - hydrostatic pressure; >, better or more important