Table 5.
Inference Results: Abecedarian Intervention
| Variable | # C | # T | Ctr. M. | Treat. M. | Diff. Ms. | Asy. p-val. | Naive p-val. | Blk. p-val. | Per. S.D. | Blk. p-val. | IPW P. S.D. | Bonf. p-val. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) |
| Physical Health in the 30s - Males | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Measured weight | 9 | 18 | 100.6 | 93.80 | 6.850 | 0.242 | 0.274 | 0.320 | 0.320 | 0.154 | 0.303 | 0.462 |
| Measured height | 9 | 18 | 1.739 | 1.790 | 0.050 | 0.044 | 0.061 | 0.083 | 0.187 | 0.215 | 0.215 | 0.645 |
| BMI | 8 | 18 | 33.29 | 29.22 | 4.075 | 0.076 | 0.108 | 0.141 | 0.175 | 0.093 | 0.204 | 0.279 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Overweight (BMI≥25) | 8 | 18 | 0.750 | 0.722 | 0.028 | 0.444 | 0.455 | 0.391 | 0.466 | 0.234 | 0.234 | 0.468 |
| Obese (BMI≥30) | 8 | 18 | 0.625 | 0.556 | 0.069 | 0.376 | 0.378 | 0.448 | 0.448 | 0.227 | 0.335 | 0.454 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Diastolic blood pressure | 9 | 19 | 92.00 | 78.53 | 13.47 | 0.017 | 0.046 | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.050 |
| Systolic blood pressure | 9 | 19 | 143.3 | 125.8 | 17.54 | 0.022 | 0.059 | 0.057 | 0.085 | 0.019 | 0.031 | 0.038 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Hypertension I | 9 | 19 | 0.444 | 0.105 | 0.339 | 0.019 | 0.043 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0.010 | 0.018 | 0.020 |
| Hypertension II | 9 | 19 | 0.556 | 0.211 | 0.345 | 0.033 | 0.049 | 0.061 | 0.095 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.074 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Health Insurance at 30 y.o. - Males | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Health care coverage | 21 | 27 | 0.476 | 0.704 | 0.228 | 0.057 | 0.062 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.040 | 0.040 | 0.080 |
| Employer-provided/bought | 21 | 27 | 0.333 | 0.444 | 0.296 | 0.021 | 0.018 | 0.034 | 0.048 | 0.035 | 0.055 | 0.070 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Demand for Health Care in the 30s - Males | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Hospitalized | 9 | 19 | 0.556 | 0.211 | 0.345 | 0.033 | 0.039 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.200 |
| Scheduled treatment/exam | 21 | 27 | 0.476 | 0.222 | 0.254 | 0.033 | 0.040 | 0.026 | 0.051 | 0.043 | 0.080 | 0.086 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Lifestyles: Diet and Physical Activity at 21 y.o. - Females | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Physical activity | 28 | 25 | 0.071 | 0.320 | 0.249 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| # Fruit servings | 28 | 25 | 0.286 | 0.800 | 0.514 | 0.005 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Lifestyles: Drinking at 30 y.o. - Females | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Not a frequent drinker | 28 | 25 | 0.857 | 0.880 | 0.023 | 0.405 | 0.414 | 0.493 | 0.586 | 0.547 | 0.547 | 1.000 |
| Alcohol consumption | 28 | 25 | 3.536 | 3.180 | 0.356 | 0.422 | 0.430 | 0.536 | 0.536 | 0.516 | 0.586 | 1.000 |
| Age of onset < 17 | 28 | 25 | 0.571 | 0.280 | 0.291 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.023 | 0.061 | 0.009 | 0.023 | 0.018 |
Notes: This table presents the inference results for selected outcomes of the Abecedarian Intervention. The columns present the following information: (1) describes the variable of interest; (2) displays the sample size for the control group; (3) displays the sample size for the treatment group; (4) displays the control mean; (5) displays the treatment mean; (6) displays the unconditional difference in means between treatment and control groups (absolute value); (7) displays the asymptotic p-value for the one-sided single hypothesis based on the t-statistic associated with the unconditional difference in means. The remaining columns present permutation p-values based on 30,000 draws. (8) displays the single hypothesis one-sided naive permutation p-value (by naive we mean based on an unconstrained permutation scheme); (9) displays the one-sided single hypothesis constrained permutation p-value based on the t-statistic associated with the difference in means between treatment groups (by constrained permutation we mean that permutations are done within strata defined by the pre-program variables used in the randomization protocol: gender, cohort indicator, number of siblings, high risk index at birth, and mother WAIS full IQ score. More specifically, we simulate the pairwise matching defined in the randomization protocol using these variables and permute the treatment status within matched participants). (10) displays the multiple hypothesis testing (stepdown) p-values associated with (9). The multiple hypothesis testing is applied to blocks of outcomes indicated by horizontal lines. (11) displays the one-sided single hypothesis constrained permutation p-value based on the IPW (Inverse Probability Weighting) t-statistic associated with the difference in means between treatment groups. Probabilities of IPW are estimated using gender- and wave-specific covariates. See Campbell et al. (2014) for details. (12) displays the multiple hypothesis testing (stepdown) p-values associated with (11). The multiple hypothesis testing is applied to block of outcomes indicated by horizontal lines. (13) displays the Bonferroni p-value=m × pIP W, where pIP W is the unadjusted p-value in col. (11) and m is the number of hypotheses to test in the block.
Ctr. or C=Control; Treat. or T=Treatment; M.=Mean; Ms.=Means; Diff.=Difference; Asy.=Asymptotic; Blk.=Block; Per.=Permutation; p-val.=p-value; S.D.=Stepdown; y.o.=years old; IPW=Inverse Probability Weighting; Bonf.=Bonferroni.