Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2016 Nov 13;319:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.013

Fig. 4. Fear Conditioning.

Fig. 4

Schematic of Fear Conditioning paradigm (A). During context and cued fear conditioning both CDDP-P25 (n = 10) and CDDP-P35 (n = 10) rats showed a trend toward decreasing freezing response during the context test (p = 0.14 and p = 0.17) as compared to controls (n = 7). During the Cue and post-Cue Test, CDDP-P25 rats showed significant decrease in freezing (***p < 0.001). During the Cue Test, CDDP-P35 rats showed significant decreased freezing response (*p < 0.05) which persisted to a lesser degree in the Post–Cue Test (p = 0.06) (B). Error bars are SEM.