Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Dec 12;52(3):400–408. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.265

Table 3b.

Hazard ratios for clinically significant predictors of major outcomes after single and double UCBT

Single UCBT
Overall Survival Disease-Free Survival Relapse Non-Relapse Mortality Chronic GVHD
Gr. II–IV Acute GVHD 0.69 (0.51–0.93)
p=0.014
2.06 (1.47–2.88)
p<0.0001
2.02 (1.51–2.70)
p<0.0001
Primary Disease1 0.73 (0.58 – 0.91)
p=0.0054
0.71 (0.57–0.89)
p=0.0024
Disease Status at Transplant2 1.37 (1.06 – 1.76)
2.89 (2.14–3.91)
p<0.0001
1.32 (1.03–1.68)
2.58 (1.90–3.50)
p<0.0001
1.57 (1.12–2.21)
4.88 (3.28–7.27)
p<0.0001
CMV Positivity 1.47 (1.19–1.82)
p=0.0003
1.45 (1.17–1.79)
p=0.0006
1.77 (1.27–2.46)
p=0.0008
Age3 0.77 (0.56–1.07)
0.61 (0.41–0.89)
p=0.011
1.40 (0.95–2.07)
2.03 (1.37–3.01)
p=0.0018
Absence of ATG 1.49 (1.08–2.07)
p=0.016
0.44 (0.30–0.66)
p<0.0001
TBI Use 0.59 (0.43–0.81)
p=0.0013
Double UCB
Overall Survival Disease-Free Survival Relapse Treatment-Related Mortality Chronic GVHD
Gr. II–IV Acute GVHD 2.12 (1.52–2.95)
p<0.0001
Primary Disease1 1.02 (0.81–1.28)
1.86 (1.39–2.48)
p<0.0001
Disease Status at Transplant2 1.02 (0.81–1.28)
1.56 (1.12–2.18)
p=0.022
1.42 (1.01–2.00)
3.56 (2.27–5.57)
p<0.0001
TBI Use 0.73 (0.55–0.97)
p=0.032
0.67 (0.45–1.00)
p=0.049
Karnofsky Performance Status4 0.71 (0.57–0.89)
p=0.0028
0.77 (0.61–0.97)
p=0.024
0.66 (0.48–0.90)
p=0.0095
Conditioning Regimen5 1.36 (1.10–1.69)
p=0.0048
2.53 (1.84–3.47)
p<0.0001
0.59 (0.40–0.87)
p=0.0083
Age3 1.28 (0.88–1.87)
1.83 (1.17–2.86)
p=0.029

Hazards for each relationship presented, p values for entire trend presented

1

ALL vs AML

2

Intermediate vs. Early, Advanced vs. Early

3

Age 5–9 vs. 0–4 and 10–17 vs. 0–4 for single UCBT; Age 18–29 vs. 30–49 vs. 50+ for double UCBT

4

Karnofsky performance status < 90 vs 90–100

5

Redcued Intensity vs. Myeloablative