Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 2;8:223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00223

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations for each group separately (N = 250).

(1) (2) (3) (4) n
G1 (INTERVENTION GROUP)
(1) Pr1_T1 0.80 137
(2) Pr2_T1 0.81 0.80 137
(3) Pr1_T2 0.51 0.52 0.74 113
(4) Pr2_T2 0.48 0.59 0.78 0.79 113
M 3.44 3.49 3.62 3.71
SD 0.75 0.72 0.60 0.62
Sk −0.51 −0.60 −0.34 −0.61
Ku −0.06 0.43 −0.13 0.02
G2 (CONTROL GROUP)
(1) Pr1_T1 0.77 113
(2) Pr2_T1 0.76 0.76 113
(3) Pr1_T2 0.74 0.67 0.75 91
(4) Pr2_T2 0.65 0.73 0.78 0.75 91
M 3.42 3.49 3.49 3.55
SD 0.70 0.71 0.65 0.64
Sk −0.39 −0.55 −0.27 −0.41
Ku −0.12 −0.01 −0.44 −0.49

Pr1_T1, Parallel form 1 of the Prosociality scale at Time 1; Pr2_T1, Parallel form 2 of the Prosociality scale at Time 1; Pr1_T2, Parallel form 1 of the Prosociality scale at Time 2; Pr2_T2, Parallel form 2 of the Prosociality scale at Time 2; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; Sk, skewness; Ku, kurtosis; n, number of subjects for each parallel form in each group.

Italicized numbers in diagonal are reliability coefficients (Cronbach's α).

All correlations were significant at p ≤ 0.001.