Table 1.
parameter | definition | example | advantages | disadvantages | reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
capillary density (CD) | no. of capillaries per muscle area | — easy to compute — easy to automate |
— dependent on fibre size and type — 2D measure |
— 476 ± 12 mm−2 in rat soleus [23] | |
capillary-to-fibre ratio (C : F) | no. of capillaries per muscle fibre | — gives information on metabolic activity — independent of fibre size — dependent on fibre type — easy to compute — easy to automate |
— 2D measure | — 2.30 ± 0.03 mouse soleus [22] — 2.17 ± 0.06 mouse soleus [24] — 1.83 ± 0.04 mouse soleus [25] |
|
tortuosity | — easy to automate | — not related to oxygen demand but sarcomere length — different definitions available — connected vessel network required |
— 1.86 ± 0.06 in healthy rat soleus versus 1.19 ± 0.10 in diabetic rat [26] | ||
length density | — indication for available oxygen exchange length | — no information on exchange volume — may differ from original stereological definition — depends on tortuosity |
— 1.88 ± 0.07 × 103 mm2 mouse soleus [24] — 12.06 ± 0.90 × 103 mm mouse soleus total capillary length [25] |
||
volume fraction | — indication for available oxygen exchange volume | — no information on exchange length — computationally expensive |
— 0.07 ± 0.01 in healthy rat soleus versus 0.03 ± 0.01 in diabetic rat [26] |