Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):19. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7020019

Table 3.

Post-hoc results for significant interactions.

Treatment Test Pre Post FU Pre-Post ES Post-FU ES
t p t p
MT FES-I 30(10.2) 28.6(9.2) 29.5(9.5) 2.777 0.006 −0.14 −1.773 0.079 0.10
MixT 32(9.3) 29.7(8.5) 30.7(8.7) 3.889 <0.001 −0.25 −2.181 0.031 0.11
CT 29.9(9.7) 30.1(9.4) 29.3(9.9) −0.187 0.852 0.01 1.293 0.199 −0.07
AC 31.3(11) 30.6(10.5) 30.3(10.3) 1.245 0.215 −0.06 0.716 0.475 −0.03
MT RAVLT d 6.3(3.8) 6.9(3.5) 7(3.7) −2.780 0.006 0.17 −0.443 0.659 0.03
MixT 5.7(3.5) 6.6(3.3) 7.3(3.2) −5.986 <0.001 0.25 −3.555 0.001 0.22
CT 5.8(3.7) 6.7(3.7) 7.4(3.8) −5.782 <0.001 0.24 −3.405 0.001 0.20
AC 5.9(3.5) 6.2(3.3) 6.6(3.3) −1.593 0.114 0.09 −2.076 0.040 0.12

Abbreviations: FU: follow-up; t: Student’s t; p: p-value (significant p-values are in bold); ES: effect size; MT: motor training; CT: cognitive training; MixT: mixed training; AC: active control; FES-I: Falls Efficacy Scale-International; RAVLT d: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, delayed recall.