Table 1.
Important performance of enzymatic and non-enzymatic glucose sensors are summarized.
| Sensor | Detect Limit (mM) | Linear Range (mM) | Sensitivity (μA/cm2mM) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzymatic Glucose Sensor | ||||
| GOx/ZnO/Au | 10−2 | 0.01–3.45 | 23.1 | Wei et al. 2006 [19] |
| GOx/C@ZnO nanowire/Ti | 10−3 | 0.01–16 | 35.3 | Liu et al. 2009 [20] |
| GOx/ZnO | 5.6 × 10−3 | Not mentioned | 21 | Ren et al. 2009 [21] |
| GR–CNT/ZnO–GOx | 4.5 × 10−3 | 0.01–6.5 | 5.36 | Hwa et al. 2014 [22] |
| GOx/BSA/Nafion/ZnO nanorod/GE | 2.2 × 10−4 | 0.6–1.4 | 10.911 | Marie et al. 2015 [23] |
| GOx/ZnO nanoparticle/IL/ESM | 10−10 | 10−9–600 | Not mentioned | Noor et al. 2015 [24] |
| GOx/Pt-Pb/CNTs | 10−3 | Up to 11 | 17.8 | Cui et al. 2007 [25] |
| GOx/Cu/MWCNTs | 2.1 × 10−4 | 0.7–3.5 | 251.4 | Kang et al. 2007 [26] |
| Non-enzymatic glucose sensor | ||||
| ZnO nanoparticle | Not mentioned | 1–10 | 38.133 | Singh et al. 2012 [27] |
| ZnO–CuO | 2.1 × 10−4 | 0.47 × 10−3–1.6 | 3066.4 | Zhou et al. 2014 [28] |
| ZnO nanowire/EμPAD | 5.95 × 10−2 | 0–15 | 8.24 | Zhao et al. 2015 [29] |
| Ni/NiO-rGO-Nafion/SPE | 1.8 × 10−3 | 0.03–6.44 | 1997 | Zhang et al. 2016 [30] |
| C@ZnO/GC | 1 | 1–13.8 | 2.97 | This study |