Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 7;17(Suppl 1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0864-0

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Distribution of CGIs and Alus in gene-defined bins categories compared to average DHS density. The correlations between the subjects (without 0 – class) are: Alu-Genes: (r = 0.93, t = 10.54; df = 17; P < 2.3E-10); Alu-CGIs (r = 0.96 t = 16; df = 20; P < 5.0E-14); Genes-CGI (r = 0.98, t = 21.2; P < 2.4E-21). The average DHS density linear regression presented on the plot is also significant: r = 0.91; t = 10.12; df = 18; P < 1.1E-8)