Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;20(3):260–265. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0550

Table 3.

Challenges and Areas for Future Research/Intervention

Distressing/difficult-to-witness signs and symptoms
 Finding more effective ways to educate patients, caregivers, and hospice providers about managing common symptoms at the end of life
 Implementing telemedicine technology to better track symptoms and notify providers when escalation of symptoms occurs
 Developing better predictors to identify patients who may require enhanced symptom management
EMS versus hospice response times
 Developing partnerships between hospices and EMS
 Utilizing synchronous telemedicine technology to communicate with patients/caregivers at times of crisis
Patients requiring palliative interventions not deliverable at home
 Assessing patient and caregiver knowledge in regards to more intensive hospice services (e.g., CHC, GIP)
 Earlier identification of patients who need CHC or GIP level of care
 Expanding palliative care interventions (e.g., ultrasound) that can be performed at home and studying its impact on hospitalization/quality of care
Desire to seek care from nonhospice physicians and hospital
 Incorporating and involving physicians into patients' hospice care plan

CHC, continuous home care; EMS, Emergency Medical Services; GIP, general inpatient.