Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;2(5):e90772. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.90772

Figure 2. Rapid-expansion protocol (REP) does not improve Th17 yield and reduces antitumor efficacy.

Figure 2

(A) Schematic for growth of Th17 and REP Th17 cultures. (B) Yield of Th17 and REP Th17 cells after 2 weeks of culture, representative of 3 independent cultures. (C) CD44 and CD62L memory marker expression on Th17 or REP Th17 cells on day 15, n = 3 independent cultures. (D) Mice with B16F10 were treated with 2 × 106 Th17 cells or REP Th17 cells after 5 Gy total body irradiation; n = 10 mice/group, representative of 2 independent experiments. (E) Percentage survival of cohorts treated with Th17 or REP Th17 cells; Kaplan-Meier curves compared by log-rank test. (F) Mean frequency (± SEM) of donor Th17 or REP Th17 cells in spleen of treated mice; n = 5–8 mice/group. (G) Mean frequency (± SEM) of donor Th17 or REP Th17 cells in tumors of treated mice; n = 5 mice/group. (H) Memory response of donor Th17 or REP Th17 cells evaluated by an in vivo cytotoxicity assay reported as mean percentage specific lysis (± SEM); n = 5–8 mice/group. Donor Th17 versus REP Th17 mean frequency and percentage specific lysis compared by Student’s t test. **P < 0.01. ns, not significant. TRP, CD4+ T cells with a TCR specific for tyrosinase-related protein-1.