Table 2.

Results for the ANOVA performed for the chemical element analysis of the pod valves.

Element	MIDAS vs. MG38				Indehiscent vs. dehiscent				<7.14 vs. ≥7.14% shattering
	M.S.	F1, 4	P	$R_{adj}^2$	M.S.	F1, 227	P	$R_{adj}^2$	M.S.	F1, 227	P	$R_{adj}^2$
Carbon	12.30	256.0	< 0.0001	0.92	191.93	105.2	< 0.0001	0.31	286.04	202.92	< 0.0001	0.47
Hydrogen	0.04	8.1	0.047	0.15	0.72	6.7	0.010	0.02	0.29	2.63	0.110	0.01
Nitrogen	0.00	0.5	0.502	0.00	0.10	2.3	0.130	0.01	0.05	1.34	0.250	0.00

ANOVA was applied to the following comparisons: Parental lines MG38 (dehiscent) vs. MIDAS (indehiscent); indehiscent vs. dehiscent introgression lines; and introgression lines with <7.14 vs. ≥7.14% shattering pods. M.S., Mean Square; F_x/y, F ratio with x and y degrees of freedom for the numerator and denminator, respectively. $R_{adj}^2$, adjusted R²; P, significance level.