Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Educ. 2018 Apr;33(2):371–374. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1107-1

Table 1.

Number and Percentage of Websites with Quantitative Information by Audience and Information Type (N = 65)

Consumer Healthcare Professional
Benefit Risk Benefit Risk
Website included Example No. % No. % No. % No. %
Quantitative information 39 60.0 32 49.2 62 95.4 62 95.4
 Every benefit/risk 25 38.5 2 3.1 56 86.1 4 6.2
 Some benefits/risks 14 21.5 30 46.2 6 9.2 58 89.2
Frequency 10 15.4 5 7.7 6 9.2 16 24.6
 1 out of X format 1 in 4 participants 5 7.7 3 4.6 1 1.5 3 4.6
 N out of X format 23 out of 100 participants 6 9.2 3 4.6 5 7.7 15 23.1
Probabilities 37 56.9 31 47.7 62 95.4 61 93.8
 Percentages 23% of participants 34 52.3 31 47.7 62 95.4 61 93.8
 Absolute risk reduction Fewer patients (4% less) 4 6.2 0 0 3 4.6 1 1.5
 Relative risk/relative risk
 reduction
43% increase in benefit 19 29.2 0 0 37 56.9 2 3.1
 Number needed to treat Need to treat 83 patients to prevent
1event
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Kaplan-Meier curve y-axis Proportion event-free (0-1) 0 0 0 0 16 24.6 0 0
Mean An average of 2.5 months 5 7.7 0 0 10 15.4 3 4.6
Median A median time of 8 months 13 20.0 1 1.5 46 70.8 7 10.8
Ratio (e.g., hazard, odds) Hazard ratio of 0.90 1 1.5 0 0 40 61.5 0 0
P-value P < 0.001 1 1.5 0 0 40 61.5 0 0
Confidence interval (CI), standard
error, or standard deviation
95% CI: 5.6, 7.1 1 1.5 0 0 45 59.2 1 1.5
Other quantitative information 2 cases reported 4 6.2 0 0 0 0 4 6.2
Text descriptors The majority 12 18.5 2 3.1 19 29.2 9 13.8
Bar graph 10 15.4 1 1.5 44 67.7 13 20.0
Pie chart 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Line graph 1 1.5 0 0 50 76.9 4 6.2
Pictograph or icon array 5 7.7 0 0 3 4.6 1 1.5
Table 4 6.2 8 12.3 22 33.8 53 81.5
Other graph 3 4.6 0 0 9 13.8 0 0

Note. This table presents whether there was quantitative information about benefits (risks) presented for every benefit (risk) or some of the benefits (risks).