Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: Astron Astrophys. 2017 Feb 21;599:A20. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629445

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Top row: CH+ 120 µm compared with H2 v=1-0 S(1) and [CII] 158 µm. CH+ 120 µm contours overlaid on the H2 map (left) and [CII] map (right). Zoom: map of vibrationally excited H2 convolved to the spatial resolution of CH+ J=3-2 map including contours of CH+ J=3-2. Bottom row: OH 84 µm compared with H2 v=1-0 S(1) and [OI] 145 µm. OH 84 µm contours overlaid on the H2 map (left) and [OI] map (right). All contours are with contour steps of 20 % of the peak emission, except for the zoomed picture where the contours are with contour steps of 10%. The maps are in units of erg s−1 cm−2 sr−1. The H2 v=1-0 S(1) data taken from (Walmsley et al. 2000, big map) and (van der Werf et al. 1996, zoomed map). The [CII] 158 µm and [OI] 145 µm data were taken from (Bernard-Salas et al. 2012).