Table 3.
Nurses (n = 47), % (n) | PGY1 (n = 23), % (n) | Attendings (n = 18), % (n) | Total (n = 88), p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barriers to palliative care consultation | ||||
PC is always or usually discussed on rounds | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 38 (6) | <0.01 |
Clear criteria for PC consultation are not available | 50 (19) | 42 (8) | 33 (5) | 0.5 |
I requested PC consultation for patient on LT list | 79 (37) | 91 (19) | 38 (6) | <0.01 |
Reasons for failure to consult palliative care | ||||
It is difficult to prognosticate end of life in ESLD patients | 39 (11) | 47 (9) | 40 (6) | 0.4 |
PC and LT are mutually exclusive | 11 (4) | 11 (2) | 20 (3) | 0.6 |
It is not my place to suggest PC consultation | 55 (21) | 68 (13) | 7 (1) | <0.01 |
I did not believe PC would offer additional benefit | 8 (3) | 32 (6) | 33 (5) | 0.03 |
I thought the patient would perceive team is giving up | 19 (7) | 21 (4) | 33 (5) | 0.5 |
Involving PC is giving up on the patient | 5 (2) | 5 (1) | 7 (1) | 1.0 |
Benefits to palliative care consultation | ||||
Patients welcomed GOC discussions | 84 (38) | 77 (17) | 87 (14) | 0.07 |
Patients were grateful for PC consultation | 90 (35) | 100 (18) | 100 (15) | 0.2 |
PC helped provide higher quality of care | 93 (38) | 100 (18) | 100 (15) | 0.3 |
There were patients who did not receive PC consultation who would have benefitted from one | 93 (42) | 95 (18) | 50 (8) | <0.01 |
Most providers agree that there are no clear criteria for consulting PC in the LT population. Respondent groups agreed that PC and LT are not mutually exclusive. Nurses and PGY1 did not recommend PC because they felt it was not their place. Respondents agreed that there were multiple benefits to PC consultation. Attendings were least likely to report that there were patients who may have benefitted from PC but did not receive a PC consultation.
ESLD, end-stage liver disease; GOC, goals of care; PC, palliative care.
Bolded values are statistically significant.