Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;292(8):3186–3200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.751685

TABLE 2.

Univariate Cox regression analyses of recurrence-free survival and overall survival after surgery in 120 HCCs

Boldface values indicate p < 0.05. p values are from Cox regression analysis. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio, HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AFP, α-fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic liver cancer staging.

Characteristics RFS
OS
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
Age 1.002 (0.980–1.024) 0.892 0.996 (0.974–1.019) 0.719
Gender (male versus female) 2.083 (0.952–4.557) 0.068 2.346 (0.942–5.848) 0.069
Liver cirrhosis (present versus absent) 0.933 (0.446–1.951) 0.855 1.230 (0.531–2.851) 0.631
Child-Pugh (B versus A) 1.233 (0.450–3.381) 0.686 2.620 (1.126–6.097) 0.026
HBsAg (positive versus negative) 0.690 (0.362–1.318) 0.264 1.388 (0.599–3.217) 0.448
ALT, IU (>40 versus ≤40) 1.195 (0.732–1.951) 0.478 1.446 (0.857–2.441) 0.169
AFP, ng/ml (>20 versus ≤20) 1.069 (0.636–1.798) 0.802 2.024 (1.074–3.814) 0.030
Tumor size, cm (>5 versus ≤5) 2.766 (1.677–4.561) <0.001 4.321 (2.518–7.416) <0.001
Tumor number (multiple versus single) 1.010 (0.540–1.887) 0.976 1.043 (0.554–1.963) 0.897
Tumor encapsulation (none versus complete) 1.716 (1.050–2.804) 0.032 1.724 (1.029–2.889) 0.040
Tumor differentiation (3 + 4 versus 1 + 2) 1.400 (0.829–2.365) 0.211 1.611 (0.944–2.750) 0.082
Vascular invasion (present versus absent) 2.030 (1.237–3.332) 0.005 2.599 (1.520–4.442) <0.001
BCLC stage (B + C versus 0 + A) 2.927 (1.770–4.837) <0.001 4.720 (2.673–8.333) <0.001
TNM stage (III versus I + II) 1.730 (1.055–2.836) 0.031 4.124 (2.394–7.104) <0.001
GALNT4 (high versus low) 0.286 (0.167–0.489) <0.001 0.313 (0.176–0.557) <0.001