Table 4.
Effect of soaking and cooking on chymotrypsin inhibitory activity of pulses and soybean
| Type | Chymotrypsin inhibitory activity (CIU/mg dry matter) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Soaked | Cooked | |
| Pea | |||
| Whole yellow pea | 2.84 ± 0.09aL | 2.56 ± 0.21b (9.83) | ndc (100) |
| Split yellow pea | 3.23 ± 0.20aJKL | 2.89 ± 0.09b (10.28) | ndc (100) |
| Whole green pea | 3.13 ± 0.03aKL | 2.87 ± 0.07b (8.35) | ndc (100) |
| Split green pea | 3.34 ± 0.17aIJKL | 2.88 ± 0.08b (13.80) | ndc (100) |
| Lentil | |||
| Whole red lentil | 4.14 ± 0.33aGHIJ | 3.87 ± 0.34b (6.62) | ndc (100) |
| Split red lentil | 4.89 ± 0.17aG | 4.58 ± 0.24b (6.40) | ndc (100) |
| Football red lentil | 4.66 ± 0.13aGH | 4.19 ± 0.45b (10.21) | ndc (100) |
| Spanish brown lentil | 3.51 ± 0.10aIJKL | 3.15 ± 0.30b (10.23) | ndc (100) |
| Split yellow lentil | 4.58 ± 0.26aGHI | 4.00 ± 0.24b (12.68) | ndc (100) |
| French green lentil | 3.71 ± 0.12aHIJKL | 3.42 ± 0.18b (7.82) | ndc (100) |
| Large green lentil | 4.55 ± 0.11aGH | 4.10 ± 0.11b (9.78) | ndc (100) |
| Medium green lentil | 3.89 ± 0.09aHIJK | 3.42 ± 0.19b (12.03) | ndc (100) |
| Split queen green lentil | 4.02 ± 0.03aGHIJK | 3.79 ± 0.25b (5.64) | ndc (100) |
| Faba bean | |||
| Whole faba bean | 1.12 ± 0.09aM | 0.99 ± 0.09b (11.43) | ndc (100) |
| Split faba bean | 1.67 ± 0.11aM | 1.37 ± 0.10b (17.51) | ndc (100) |
| Chickpea | |||
| Whole chickpea B90 | 12.29 ± 0.34aF | 10.83 ± 0.14b (11.85) | ndc (100) |
| Split chickpea B90 | 13.59 ± 0.26aE | 11.06 ± 0.26b (18.58) | ndc (100) |
| Desi chickpea | 11.78 ± 0.22aF | 10.47 ± 0.32b (11.14) | ndc (100) |
| Bean | |||
| Dark red kidney bean | 21.00 ± 0.88aC | 18.81 ± 0.19b (10.45) | ndc (100) |
| Pinto bean | 17.77 ± 0.07aD | 16.50 ± 0.18b (9.68) | ndc (100) |
| Navy bean | 18.67 ± 0.12aD | 17.25 ± 0.59b (7.60) | ndc (100) |
| Black bean | 24.48 ± 0.97aB | 21.42 ± 0.61b (12.40) | ndc (100) |
| Soybean | 30.16 ± 0.17aA | 28.14 ± 0.45b (6.71) | ndc (100) |
Row values followed by different superscript lowercase letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) as determined using Tukey’s test
Column values for raw samples followed by different superscript uppercase letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) as determined using Tukey’s test
Values in parentheses indicate % decrease over raw values
Mean ± SD of three determinations
nd not detected