Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2016 Oct 4;71(4):570–581. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.032

Table 4.

Evidence overview of combined solifenacin 5–6 mg plus tamsulosin 0.2–0.4 mg versus tamsulosin 0.2–0.4 mg monotherapy

Outcome No. of trials (evaluated) Intervention, % (n/N) or mean Control, % (n/N) or mean Results and magnitude of effect (95% CI) Strength of evidence
Responders Not reported Insufficient
I-PSS score, mean change from baseline 6 (1948) −5.8 points −5.4 points Similar between groups:
WMD −0.29 (−0.88–0.30)
Moderatea
I-PSS QoL, mean change from baseline 4 (1225) −1.2 points −0.9 points Similar between groups:
WMD −0.18 (−0.39 to −0.03)
Moderatea
Overall withdrawals 7 (3147) 10 (203/2028) 11 (121/1119) Similar between groups:
RR 1.02 (0.74–1.41)
Lowa,b
Withdrawals due to adverse effects 5 (2900) 4 (71/1904) 3 (30/996) Similar between groups:
RR 1.27 (0.81–2.0)
Lowa,b
Participants with ≥1 adverse effect 5 (2918) 33 (623/1913) 29 (280/1005) Greater with combined therapy:
RR 1.21 (1.09–1.35)
Moderatea

CI = confidence intervals; I-PSS = International Prostate Symptom Score; QoL = quality of life; RR = risk ratio; WMD = weighted mean difference.

Downgraded based on the following:

a

Risk of bias (moderate).

b

Imprecision.