Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec 1;152(4):830–839.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.043

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Participants in the Nested Case Control Cohort a

Characteristic (Total No.)a Missing, No. (%) Serology Negative (n=562) Serology Positive (n=281) Matched Resultb OR (95% CI) (P Value)
Age at serum draw, y (n=843), 0 (0) 35.1 (9.5) 35.1 (9.5) NA
Female sex (n=843) 0 (0) 358 (64) 179 (64) NA
Race (n=755) 88 (10) Overall P=.02
 Caucasian 453 (90%) 243 (96%) 1.0 (reference)
 African American 20 (4%) 2 (1%) 0.13 (0.03–0.66)
 Asian 24 (5%) 3 (1%) 0.23 (0.07–0.82)
 Other 6 (1%) 4 (2%) 1.13 (0.29–4.36)
Weight, kg (n=763) 80 (9) 81.1 (23.6) 80.7 (19.6) 0.99 (0.92–1.08) (.85)c
Height, cm (n=773) 70 (8) 169.5 (9.8) 169.3 (9.6) 0.98 (0.79–1.22) (.88)c
BMI, kg/m2 (n=737) 106 (13) 28.1 (7.3) 28.1 (6.1) 1.00 (0.79–1.27) (.99)c
BMI categories (n=737) a 106 (13) Overall P=.09
 <25 203 (42) 90 (36) 1.0 (reference)
 25–30 127 (26) 83 (33) 1.66 (1.10–2.50)
 30–35 76 (16) 40 (16) 1.34 (0.82–2.19)
 >35 81 (17) 37 (15) 1.10 (0.66–1.82)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Categorical variables are presented as number (percentage) of available responses and continuous data as mean (±SD).

b

Each variable was assessed for an association with positive serology using matched analysis (conditional logistic regression analyzed on matched sets, with matching variables included as adjusting covariates in each model).

c

Data were rescaled in regression model to express the OR per 10-unit increase (ie, a 10-kg increase in weight).