Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2017 Jan 29;346:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.01.028

Table 3.

Results of regression models demonstrating behaviors and brain regions in which endocannabinoid-related expression explain variance in song-associated reward (measured via CPP).

Endocannabinoid-related gene Regression model Variables Beta p

CB1 receptor
n = 14
Adjusted R2 = 0.770
F5,8 = 9.69
p = 0.0030
VTA 0.374 0.0466*
PAG -0.468 0.0131*
POM -0.028 0.8724
Number of songs 0.398 0.0495*
Non-vocal behaviors 0.007 0.9653

FABP7
n = 13
Adjusted R2 = 0.687
F5,7 = 6.27
p = 0.0160
VTA -0.058 0.7932
PAG -0.460 0.0476*
POM 0.771 0.0133*
Number of songs -0.020 0.9475
Non-vocal behaviors -0.091 0.6432

FABP5
n = 13
Adjusted R2 = 0.409
F5,7 = 2.66
p = 0.1172
VTA -0.047 0.8541
PAG -0.132 0.7388
POM 0.751 0.1366
Number of songs 0.298 0.3319
Non-vocal behaviors -0.078 0.7933

FAAH
n = 12
Adjusted R2 = 0.565
F4,7 = 4.57
p = 0.0394
PAG -0.186 0.3908
POM -0.281 0.2485
Number of songs 0.369 0.1787
Non-vocal behaviors 0.452 0.0867

DAGLᆆ
n = 15
Adjusted R2 = 0.385
F3,11 = 3.92
p = 0.0398
POM 0.027 0.9033
Number of songs 0.611 0.0340*
Non-vocal behaviors 0.177 0.4934
*

Indicates a significant predictor variable (p ≤ 0.05).

Indicates VTA was not included in regression model (see text for details).

††

Indicates VTA and PAG were not included in regression model (see text for details).