Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;7(1):59–78. doi: 10.21037/qims.2017.02.03

Table S1. Dslow, PF, Dfast value and measurement information of animal IVIM liver studies*.

Paper Animal Sample size (n) Field strength (T) Respiratory compensation b value number b distribution Post-processing algorithm Mean Dslow (10-3 mm2/s) Mean PF (%) Mean Dfast (10-3 mm2/s)
Eberhardt et al. 2016 Rat 21 4.7 Respiratory trigger 9 0, 13, 24, 55, 107, 260, 514, 767, 1020 ROI analysis and asymptotic fitting 1.15±0.14 14.77±6.15 50.28±33.21
Hu et al. 2015 Rat 15 3.0 FB 8 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 300, 500, 800 Pixel-wise asymptotic fitting then ROI analysis with parametric map 0.98±0.07 22.00±3.00 34.99±2.21
Joo et al. 2014 Rabbit 6 3.0 FB 7 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800 Pixel-wise nonlinear simultaneous fitting then ROI 0.81 16.50 24.70
Chow et al. 2012 Rabbit 12 7.0 Respiratory trigger 8 0, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 ROI analysis then nonlinear simultaneous fitting 0.67±0.08 27.24±6.34
Ye et al. 2015 Rabbit 8 1.5 FB 12 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, 300, 500, 800 Pixel-wise nonlinear simultaneous fitting then ROI analysis 1.14±0.07 14.60±3.60 143.3±39.3

*, only measurements of normal liver tissue were included. IVIM, intravoxel incoherent motion, FB, free-breathing.