Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep 5;27(5):2055–2066. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4571-4

Table 2.

Per-patient pooled reader confidence by reconstruction algorithm

Lesion Category Mean ± SD (Total N) SD-FBP RD-FBP RD-ASIR RD-MBIR
Mean diagnostic confidence* with P-values
True positive malignant lesions 2.89 ± 0.40 (199) 2.77 ± 0.55 (174) P=0.016 2.79 ± 0.56 (177) P=0.038 2.87 ± 0.39 (182) P=0.596
True positive benign lesions 2.96 ± 0.24 (103) 2.96 ± 0.19 (84) P=0.922 2.95 ± 0.28 (75) P=0.711 2.91 ± 0.33 (76) P=0.215
False positive lesions 2.43 ± 0.85 (14) 1.64 ± 0.60 (14) P=0.009 2.00 ± 0.51 (12) P=0.141 1.69 ± 0.54 (32) P<0.001
False negative lesions (mets mischaracterized as benign) 3.00 ± 0.00 (2) 2.33 ± 1.15 (3) P=0.495 2.50 ± 0.71 (2) P=0.423 3.00 ± N/A (1) P=N/A
True negative patients 2.70 ± 0.55 (90) 1.98 ± 0.63 (97) P<0.001 1.98 ± 0.74 (97) P<0.001 1.62 ± 0.64 (82) P<0.001
*

Three point scale: 1 = low confidence, 2 = somewhat confident, 3 = high confidence

P-values compared to SD-FBP