Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 6;8:220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00220

Table 4.

Summary of neuroimaging studies using emotion-task experiments in different mindfulness conditions.

Mindfulness condition (different models) vs control condition (Waiting list, or active control) Study design Population Sample size: mindfulness (M) vs control groups (C) Experimental task and neuro-imaging method: resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), task based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG) Main finding: summarized in terms of brain, and/or physiological response changes References
DISPOSITIONAL MINDFULNESS
Dispositional mindfulness Cross sectional/Uncontrolled study Healthy M: 27 Affect labeling task during fMRI Level of DM mediates the relationship between right vMPFC, right vLPFC activation and right amygdala deactivation Creswell et al., 2007
Dispositional mindfulness Cross sectional/Uncontrolled study Healthy M: 27 Viewing negative emotional faces during fMRI + rs-fMRI Higher DM correlated with less amygdala reactivity. Also with less resting connectivity in midline brain regions (self-referential processing) Way et al., 2010
Dispositional mindfulness Cross sectional/Uncontrolled study Healthy M: 46 Viewing negative/positive pictures during EEG (LPP: late positive potential) Higher DM correlated to lower LPP during high-arousal negative emotions Brown et al., 2013
Dispositional mindfulness Cross sectional/Uncontrolled study Healthy M: 290 rs-fMRI—local synchronization Higher DM correlated to local synch in left OFC, left parahippocampal gyrus, right insula. Local synch in OFC-predicted positive affect, and in IFG-predicted purpose/meaningful life Kong et al., 2016
MINDFULNESS INDUCTION
Mindfulness induction Cross sectional/Uncontrolled study Smokers looking for treatment to stop smoking M: 47 Cue-induced craving during fMRI. Reduced neural activity in sg-ACC [craving-related—emotion reactivity region] and a reduced functional connectivity between this same region with the bilateral insula and ventral striatum with no direct involvement of PFC regions (*) Westbrook et al., 2013
Mindfulness induction Cross sectional/Non-randomized controlled study Healthy M: 24/C: 22 Cued expectation and perception of negative pictures during fMRI During expectation major activations in prefrontal regions: left AI, right and left dMPFC and left dLPFC. During perception reduced activation in right amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus [emotion processing reactivity] (*) Lutz A. et al., 2013
Mindfulness induction vs Reappraisal strategy Cross sectional/Non-randomized controlled study Healthy M: 24/C: 23 Cued expectation and perception of negative pictures during fMRI Both groups: similar activity of the m-PFC and the amygdala. Major activations in MI group, during expectation: vLPFC, vLPFC, Supramarginal gyrus and left insula. During perception: major activity in the caudate in the cognitive group Opialla et al., 2014
MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS
Mindfulness-based stress reduction Cross sectional/Non-randomized controlled study (novice vs those who attended the course) Healthy M: 20/C: 16 Self-reference task during fMRI Significant difference in the neural correlates of the self-reference task, during experiential focus an increased activation in right brain regions: lateral PFC, insula, second somatosensory area, and IPL Farb et al., 2007
Mindfulness-based stress reduction vs Waiting list Longitudinal/Non-randomized controlled study Healthy M: 20/C: 16 Sadness induction paradigm during fMRI MBI group changed activation pattern in key emotion regulation regions: major activation in the right anterior insula, r-lPFC and sg—ACC. Farb et al., 2010
Mindfulness-based stress reduction Longitudinal/Non-Controlled trial Social Phobia M: 16 Breath focus task during fMRI Reduced amygdala activity, major activation in precuneus, SPL, IPL compared to distraction focus task Goldin and Gross, 2010
Mindfulness Training (4 days) Longitudinal/Non-Controlled trial Healthy (pain) M: 15 Breath focus meditation during noxious stimulation task in fMRI MBI reduction in pain intensity: major activation in ACC, anterior insula. MBI reduction in pain unpleasantness: major activation in OFC and thalamus (*) Zeidan et al., 2011
Mindfulness-based stress reduction vs Aerobic exercise Longitudinal/Randomized controlled trial Social Phobia M: 31/C: 25 Self-reference task during fMRI MBIs during negative self-view: major activation in PCC, and dMPFC activity-associated less social anxiety disability and mindfulness level Goldin et al., 2012
Mindfulness-based stress reduction vs Aerobic exercise Longitudinal/Randomized controlled trial Social Phobia M: 31/C: 25 Emotion regulation of negative self-beliefs task during fMRI MBI regulating negative self-beliefs: fewer negative emotions, major activation in R-IPL, R-SPL Goldin et al., 2013
Mindfulness-based stress reduction vs Stress management education Longitudinal/Randomized controlled trial Generalized Anxiety Disorder M: 15/C: 11 Affect labeling of emotional expressions during fMRI Both groups less amygdala activation. MBI major activation in vLPFC. Increase functional connectivity between amygdala and PFC regions Hölzel et al., 2013
Mindfulness Training (6 weeks) vs Shared reading and listening group Longitudinal/Randomized controlled trial Healthy M: 30/C: 31 Affective Stroop conflict resolution task during fMRI Both groups improved significantly in a response inhibition task. MBI reduced emotional interference, in negative emotion processing: increased bilateral dLPFC, right anterior insula and m-PFC (*) Allen et al., 2012
Mindfulness Training (8 weeks) vs Compassion training vs Health discussion group Longitudinal/Randomized controlled trial Healthy M: 12/C: 12/Compassion Training: 12 Observation of emotional pictures during fMRI In MBI: decrease in right amygdala activation (all valences). In Compassion Training: trend increase in right amygdala response in negative pictures (*) Desbordes et al., 2012
Mindfulness Training (4 days) vs Sham mindfulness vs Placebo vs Control Longitudinal/Randomized controlled trial (four-arm) Healthy (pain) M: 80 Pain regulation strategy during noxious stimulation task in fMRI MBI reduction in pain intensity: major activation in sg—ACC, anterior insula, OFC. Placebo analgesia: major activation in DLPFC and secondary somatosensory cortex (*) Zeidan et al., 2015
EXPERT MEDITATORS
Tibetan Buddhist monks Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 14/C: 16 Auditory stimuli during focus attention task in fMRI EM: amygdala deactivation Brefczynski-Lewis et al., 2007
Tibetan Buddhist monks Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 15/C: 15 Auditory stimuli during active compassion meditation in fMRI EM: increased activation in the anterior insula and ACC, proportional to compassion experience intensity Lutz et al., 2008a
Zen Western vs novices meditators Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 12/C: 8 Observation of emotional pictures during active meditation in fMRI EM during meditation: major deactivation of m-PFC and PCC. Relative deactivation of amygdala and insula vs novice meditators. Novice during meditation: downregulation of amygdala Taylor et al., 2011
Zen Western Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 13/C: 13 Noxious stimulus during fMRI EM during pain: reduced activation in PFC, amygdala, hippocampus. Major activations in ACC, insula, thalamus. Grant et al., 2011
Vipassana Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 17/C: 17 Noxious stimulus during fMRI EM during pain in meditation: reduced activation in lateral PFC, major activation in ACC, R-posterior insula Gard et al., 2012
Tibetan tradition Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 14/C: 14 Noxious stimulus during fMRI EM: equal pain, less unpleasantness. During pain: major AI, ACC. Minor baseline activation AI, ACC, amygdala Lutz A. et al., 2013
Buddhist Western Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 18/C: 26 Dictator Game (DG) and Ultimatum Game (UG) during Skin Conductance Level (SCL) EM: in DG reduced arousal, distress and SCL. In UG accept more unfair offers Grecucci et al., 2015b
Buddhist Western Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 26/C: 40 Ultimatum game during fMRI EM: in UG accept more unfair offers. Major activation of the posterior insula (interoception) versus anterior insula (emotion reactivity) in controls; major activation in somatosensory and posterior superior temporal cortex Kirk et al., 2011
Zen Western Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 34/C: 44 Monetary incentive delay during fMRI EM during reward anticipation: reduced activation in caudate nucleus, major activation in bilateral posterior insula. During reward receipt: reduced activation in vMPFC Kirk et al., 2011
Buddhist Western Cross sectional/Case-control study Healthy M: 28/C: 30 Passive conditioning task during fMRI EM during reward prediction: reduced positive and negative prediction error BOLD in putamen. Major activation in posterior insula Kirk et al., 2015
*

Finding indicates bottom-up mechanisms.