Table 1. Spatially-explicit GLMs showing the effect of each centrality metric on mortality.
Coefficient ± 1 SE | t | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall network | |||
Local transitivity | 33.82 ± 10.98 | 3.08 | 0.003 |
Degree centrality | 4.60 ± 2.16 | 2.13 | 0.037 |
Closeness centrality | 26.92 ± 12.90 | 2.09 | 0.042 |
Trade network | |||
Local transitivity | 32.84 ± 10.59 | 3.10 | 0.003 |
Degree centrality | 5.46 ± 2.78 | 1.96 | 0.054 |
Closeness centrality | 1.13 ± 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.263 |
Pilgrimage network | |||
Local transitivity | Not applicable | ||
Degree centrality | 1.19 ± 3.78 | 0.32 | 0.753 |
Closeness centrality | 4.14 ± 5.50 | 0.75 | 0.456 |
All models include as a covariate the year of arrival of the plague to each city. It is shown the outcome from the complete network and from the networks built using only trading and pilgrimage links, respectively. Transitivity in the pilgrimage network could not be calculated because all the triples were open.