Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;82(3):624–632. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12985

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis for studies included in the analysis

Subgroup analysis Number of studies Number of estimates Pooled OR (95% CI), I2 statistics (%), P value for the heterogeneity Q test
All estimates combined 9 21 1.88 (1.39, 2.54); I2 = 98%, P < 0.001
Elimating Lin et al.'s study [18] 8 20 1.65 (1.38, 1.97); I2 = 85.3%, P < 0.001
Elimating Wu et al.'s study [20] 8 19 1.85 (1.40, 2.46); I2 = 97.9%, P < 0.001
Study design
Case–control 4 12 1.20 (1.03, 1.40); I2 = 79.4%, P < 0.001
Cohort 3 3 2.42 (0.89, 6.60); I2 = 88.8%, P < 0.001
SCCS 2 10 1.62 (1.34, 1.95); I2 = 55.2%, P = 0.017
Case–crossover 2 3 2.51 (2.36, 2.67); I2 = 0%, P = 0.565
Type of antipsychotic drugs
typical 7 11 2.19 (1.46, 3.28); I2 = 98.4%, P < 0.001
atypical 5 7 1.72 (0.96, 3.07); I2 = 97%, P < 0.001
Diagnostic category
Schizophrenia 3 3 2.48 (1.66, 3.69); I2 = 94.7%, P < 0.001
Mood disorder 2 2 1.66 (0.86, 3.22); I2 = 71.2%, P < 0.001
Dementia 3 7 1.82 (1.16, 2.84); I2 = 92.1%, P < 0.001
Exposure time
1–30 days 3 4 2.64 (2.48, 2.81); I2 = 0%, P = 0.904
1–60 days 2 3 1.59 (1.17, 2.18); I2 = 0%, P = 0.447
1–90 days 3 7 1.35 (1.09, 1.67); I2 = 0%, P = 0.447