Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 8;82(3):762–772. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13010

Table 3.

Population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates, inter‐individual variability and median parameter values (2.5–97.5%) of the non‐parametric bootstrap replicates for the final ramosetron pharmacokinetic model

Model Parameters Estimates (RSE, %) CV (%) Median (2.5–97.5%)
Basic V 1(l) 5.2 (9.5) 46.2
V 2 (l) 108 (3.6) 27.8
CL(l∙min−1) 0.17 (3.9) 27.3
Q (l∙min−1) 1.43 (7.3) 47.4
σ2 (%) 0.274 (7.3)
Final V 1 (l) 5.12 (9.2) 45.6 5.17 (4.05–6.34)
V 2 (l) 108 (6.3) 27.5 108 (99.4–117)
CL (l∙min−1) θ1 + (59∙age−1) × θ2 θ1 0.08 (47.5) 26.3 0.06 (0.006–0.16)
θ2 0.09 (45.9) 0.11 (0.02–0.33)
Q(l∙ min−1) 1.42 (10.2) 47.0 1.41 (0.33–1.66)
σ 2, % 0.274 (3.1) 0.27 (0.24–0.32)

A log‐normal distribution of inter‐individual random variability was assumed. Residual random variability was modelled using a constant coefficient of variation (CV) model. Non‐parametric bootstrap analysis was repeated 2000 times. The shrinkage value of V 1, V 2, CL and Q was 19.98, 9.26, 9.94 and 7.99%, respectively. V 1 central volume of distribution; V 2 peripheral volume of distribution; CL clearance; Q inter‐compartmental clearance; RSE relative standard error = SE∙mean−1 × 100 (%); σ2 variance of residual random variability.