Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 17;82(3):633–644. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13005

Table 4.

Absolute difference in events per 1000 patients treated per year in the various regional subgroups*

Comparison Stroke/SEE Major bleeding
Risk difference (95%CI) Risk difference (95%CI)
All Europe (n = 32 089)
Dabigatran vs. warfarin 0 (−5 to 5) −2 (−8 to 4)
Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin −2 (−8 to 3) −2 (−8 to 3)
Apixaban vs. warfarin −1 (−4 to 3) −4 (−9 to 0.4)
Edoxaban vs. warfarin 2 (−2 to 5) −7 (−12 to −2)
All DOACs vs. warfarin 0 (−2 to 2) −4 (−7 to − 2)
Western Europe (n = 13 676)
Dabigatran vs. warfarin −2 (−7 to 5) −4 (−12 to 3)
Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin −1 (−12 to 10) −11 (−24 to 1)
Apixaban vs. warfarin 1 (−3 to 6) −2 (−9 to 6)
Edoxaban vs. warfarin 5 (−1 to 12) −6 (−17 to 4)
All DOACs vs. warfarin 1 (−1 to 4) −5 (−10 to − 0.1)
Eastern Europe (n = 18 413)
Dabigatran vs. warfarin 3 (−5 to 10) 1 (−8 to 11)
Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin −3 (−10 to 4) 1 (−5 to 7)
Apixaban vs. warfarin −3 (−9 to 4) −7 (−14 to −1)
Edoxaban vs. warfarin 0 (−4 to 4) −8 (−13 to −3)
All DOACs vs. warfarin −1 (−4 to 2) −4 (−9 to 1)
North‐America (n = 18 369)
Dabigatran vs. warfarin −4 (−8 to 1) 0 (−9 to 9)
Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin −1 (−10 to 8) 19 (5 to 34)
Apixaban vs. warfarin −4 (−9 to 1) −9 (−17 to −1)
Edoxaban vs. warfarin −6 (−10 to −1) −5 (−14 to 5)
All DOACs vs. warfarin −4 (−7 to − 2) 0 (−10 to 10)
Latin‐America (n = 8963)
Dabigatran vs. warfarin −2 (−15 to 10) −6 (−23 to 11)
Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin −5 (−17 to 7) 4 (−8 to 16)
Apixaban vs. warfarin −4 (−10 to 3) −12 (−21 to −4)
Edoxaban vs. warfarin −11 (−19 to −3) −10 (−20 to 1)
All DOACs vs. warfarin −6 (−10 to − 2) −7 (−14 to − 0.1)
Asia Pacific, other (n = 13 542)
Dabigatran vs. warfarin −10 (−18 to −2) −10 (−20 to −0.2)
Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin −5 (−15 to 4) −8 (−19 to 2)
Apixaban vs. warfarin −12 (−21 to −3) −19 (−28 to −9)
Edoxaban vs. warfarin −8 (−15 to −1) −5 (−16 to 5)
All DOACs vs. warfarin −9 (−13 to − 5) −11 (−16 to − 6)

CI, confidence interval; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulants; SEE, systemic embolic events.

*

Random effects model. The base case excludes the 30 mg/15 mg edoxaban dose.

Includes pooled data from ROCKET‐AF (subgroup of Asian patients) and J ROCKET.