Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Rehabil. 2009 Dec;23(12):1078–1085. doi: 10.1177/0269215509337465

TABLE 2.

Comparison of Gait Performance Before and After One Week of Walking with the Pacer

Initial Post One Week Score Change&
N = 21 W/O pacer Mean (SD) W/Pacer p-value W/O pacer W/Pacer p-value
Gait speed (cm/s) 79.57 (18.13) 94.02 (22.61) <.0005* 95.20 (22.23) 102.17 (30.23) <.0005# 15.55 (10.76)
Cadence (step/min) 102.88 (11.34) 109.22 (10.23) .036 106.72 (7.57) 120.46 (35.06 .146 3.84 (11.63)
Stride Length (cm) 94.33 (21.31) 103.5 (22.65) .012* 107.67 (20.01) 102.76 (19.66) .001# 13.33 (15.29)
Double support time (% GC) a 21.73 (5.23) 21.19 (4.15) .582 18.94 (3.59) 21.06 (6.35) .016# −2.79 (4.87)
Base of Support (cm) 12.25 (5.31) 12.47 (5.03) .69 11.78 (5.26) 11.95 (4.83) .354 −0.47 (2.31)
a

Double support time expressed as percentage of the gait cycle time (% GC).

*

Pre W/O pacer vs. W pacer, significant at .025 with Bonferroni correction.

#

Pre W/O pacer vs. Post one week W/O pacer.

&

Change score over one week was calculated from scores changes between initial w/o pacer and post one week w/o pacer.