Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;5(3):182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.020

Table 3.

Association between BMI and global circumferential systolic strain among JHS cardiac MRI ancillary study participants.

Model Covariates β (95% CI) P
1 age, sex, DM, smoke, HTN*, TG, HR, CVD 0.089 (0.066,0.112) <0.0001
2 Model 1 + eGFR 0.072 (0.050,0.095) <0.0001
3 Model 2 + LVEF 0.080 (0.059,0.102) <0.0001
4 Model 2 + LVEF and LV mass 0.052 (0.028,0.075) <0.0001
5 Model 3 + LVRI 0.052 (0.030,0.074) <0.0001

Data presented with BMI β coefficient. Global circumferential systolic strain (Ecc) is measured on a negative scale, thus a positive β coefficient reflects worse strain.

*

HTN used instead of systolic blood pressure and BP medication status due to >5% missing data for those variables. Models were created using these parameters with no change in the association. CVD: cardiovascular disease history, DM: diabetes, EF: ejection fraction, HR: heart rate, HTN: hypertension, LVRI: LV remodeling index, smoke: ever smoked, TG: triglycerides.