Table 3. Proportion of Users With Diabetes According to Access, Perception of Care Quality, Satisfaction With PHCs and Self-reported Receipt of Appropriate Care (Ministério da Saúde, Brasil, 2015a) (n = 6.309).

Variable	Access to Appointment at PHC in Last 6 Monthsa (%)	Organization and Management Qualityb (%)	Clinical Care Qualityc (%)	Satisfaction With Serviced (%)	Self-reported Receipt of Appropriate Caree
Region	P < .05	P < .001	P < .05	P < .05	P < .001
North	83.9	38.0	18.3	85.0	10.7
Northeast	86.2	37.6	22.2	88.3	12.3
Southeast	88.4	35.2	31.4	90.4	16.2
South	86.6	27.9	23.7	91.1	10.0
Midwest	85.8	33.2	26.6	89.0	15.9
Population size (inhabitants)	P < .05	P < .001	P < .001	P < .05	P < .001
Very small: up to 10,000	86.9	29.9	25.9	91.2	12.6
Small: 10 001-30 000	85.6	33.7	24.6	91.0	12.0
Median: 30 001-100 000	86.6	34.6	24.2	89.7	12.6
Large: 100 001-300 000	85.9	37.5	28.2	89.2	16.4
Very large: Over 300 000	89.7	36.2	32.3	88.4	14.3
HDI-M quartiles	P < .001	P = .063	P < .001	P = .786	P < .001
0.480-0.696	86.7	37.9	21.9	89.2	11.6
0.697-0.779	84.7	33.8	25.8	89.6	13.1
0.780-0.832	86.9	37.5	30.5	90.1	15.2
0.833-0.920	90.7	37.4	34.0	90.2	17.4
FHS municipal coverage terciles (%)	P < .05	P < .001	P < .001	P = .070	P < .001
Up to 47.6	88.9	40.9	32.8	89.2	17.7
47.7-82.0	86.8	36.0	25.7	89.1	12.9
82.1-100	86.1	33.2	25.3	91.0	12.1
Total	87.2	34.6	27.9	89.7	14.3

Abbreviations: FHS, Family Health Strategy; HDI-M, Municipal Human Development Index; PHC, primary health care center.

^aQuestion is valid for those reporting diagnosis of diabetes (n = 8118).

^bAt the end of one appointment, the next one is always booked.

^cPositive answers to all items: blood glucose test/foot examination/guidance on caring for feet.

^dIf they could, they would not change their health team or health center.

^eReporting having received a blood test, received guidance on foot care, had their feet examined, and having been able to book an appointment.