Table 4. Prevalence and Prevalence Ratios—Crude and Adjusted—for Self-reported Receipt of Appropriate Care According to Service Structure and Team Work Process (Ministério da Saúde, Brasil, 2015a) (n = 6309).
| Prevalencea (%) | PR (95% CI)b Crude | PR (95% CI) Adjustedc | PR (95% CI) Adjustedd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service has all 9 structure items | ||||
| No | 13.7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 20.0 | 1.47 (1.23-1.74) | 1.26 (1.04-1.54) | 1.18 (0.96-1.44) |
| High-quality service organization and management | ||||
| No | 13.4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 15.9 | 1.18 (1.05-1.34) | 1.13 (1.00-1.29) | 1.12 (0.98-1.27) |
| High-quality clinical practice | ||||
| No | 13.2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 16.4 | 1.25 (1.11-1.41) | 1.14 (0.99-1.30) | 1.11 (0.97-1.27) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HDI, Human Development Index; PR, prevalence ratio.
aSelf-reported receipt of appropriate care: in the last 6 months, had a blood glucose control test, had feet examined, received guidance on care of feet and left one appointment with the next one already booked.
bPrevalence ratio and 95% confidence interval.
cAdjusted for population size, municipal HDI and municipal Family Health coverage, and user's sex.
dAdjusted for population size, municipal HDI and municipal Family Health coverage, region, and user's sex.