Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 12;35(4):886–892. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001209

TABLE 2.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with regard to lowering blood pressure

C (US$) E C/E ΔC/ΔE
SBP DBP SBP DBP SBP DBP
Women (n = 380)
 NH 47.2 33.8 ± 14.9 16.3 ± 8.9 1.4 2.9 ND ND
 NM 62.5 34.1 ± 14.7 16.8 ± 8.8 1.8 3.7 51.0 30.6
Men (n = 243)
 NH 49.5 35.1 ± 17.5 17.9 ± 10.3 1.4 2.8 ND ND
 NM 62.2 30.6 ± 16.9 16.0 ± 10.0 2.0 3.9 −2.8 −6.7
≤65 years (n = 530)
 NH 47.1 34.1 ± 16.0 16.9 ± 9.5 1.4 2.8 ND ND
 NM 61.7 33.1 ± 15.9 16.7 ± 9.2 1.9 3.7 −14.6 −73
>65 years (n = 93)
 NH 53.9 35.7 ± 15.1 17.0 ± 9.1 1.5 3.2 ND ND
 NM 66.1 30.2 ± 15.2 15.2 ± 10.0 2.2 4.3 −2.2 −6.7
Total (n = 623)
 NH 48.0 34.3 ± 15.9 16.9 ± 9.6 1.4 2.8 Null Null
 NM 63.4 32.6 ± 15.8 16.4 ± 9.4 1.9 3.8 −8.5 −28.8

C, average cost per patient; E, effectiveness; ND, no data; NH, nitrendipine+hydrochlorothiazide; NM, nitrendipine+metoprolol.