Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;10:1335–1344. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S120341

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of included studies comparing nivolumab to other drugs

Study Year Country Study type Treatment arms Indication Fatiguea Headachea Dysgeusiaa Vertigoa Paresthesiaa Anxiety malaisea Peripheral neuropathya
Robert et al12 2015 France Phase III Arm A: nivolumab 3 mg/kg of body weight every 2 weeks (206 pts)
Arm B: dacarbazine (205 pts)
Stage III or IV unresectable melanoma without a BRAF mutation 41 (20%) versus 30 (14.6%) 9 (4.4%) versus 14 (6.8%) 6 (2.9%) versus 2 (1%) 2 (1%) versus 5 (2.4%) 2 (1%) versus 7 (3.4%) 1 (0.5%) versus 4 (2%)
Weber et al13 2015 USA Phase III Arm A: nivolumab 3 mg/kg of body weight every 2 weeks (268 pts)
Arm B: investigator choice chemotherapy (102 pts)
Patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment 67 (25%) versus 35 (34%)
Larkin et al10 2015 USA Phase III 945 patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion into:
1) nivolumab 3 mg/kg combined with placebo (316 pts)
2) ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) combined with nivolumab (1 mg/kg) (314 pts)
3) ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) combined with placebo (315 pts)
Advanced melanoma 107 (34.2%) versus 87 (28%) 23 (7.3%) versus 24 (7.7%)
Borghaei et al8 2015 USA Phase III Arm A: nivolumab 3 mg/kg of body weight every 2 weeks (292 pts)
Arm B: docetaxel (290 pts)
Advanced non-squamous cell NSCLC 91 (32%) versus 102 (38%) 29 (10%) versus 32 (12%) 7 (2%) versus 27 (10%) 25 (9%) versus 24 (9%) 12 (4%) versus 23 (9%) 16 (6%) versus 5 (2%) 9 (3%) versus 25 (9%)
Brahmer et al9 2015 USA Phase III Arm A: nivolumab 3 mg/kg of body weight every 2 weeks (131 pts)
Arm B: docetaxel (129 pts)
Advanced squamous cell NSCLC 21 (16%) versus 42 (33%) 2 (2%) versus 7 (5%) 2 (2%) versus 7 (5%) 1 (1%) versus 15 (12%)
Motzer et al11 2015 USA Phase III 821 patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10 mg everolimus tablet orally once daily Advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with 1 or 2 regimens of antiangiogenic therapy 134 (33%) versus 134 (34%) 11 (3%) versus 51 (13%)

Notes:

a

Data presented as number of patients with versus number of patients without.

Abbreviations: pts, patients; BRAF, B-Raf; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.