Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2016 Oct 25;123(6):940–947. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30425

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics by User and Non-user

Variables N Percent Tamoxifen or AI use, No. (%)a Pb
No (%) Yes (%)
Total 2871 100 1574 ( 54.8 ) 1297 ( 45.2 )
Age, years
66-70 984 34.3 460 ( 46.7 ) 524 ( 53.3 ) <.0001
71-75 877 30.5 467 ( 53.2 ) 410 ( 46.8 )
76-80 644 22.4 403 ( 62.6 ) 241 ( 37.4 )
81-85 366 12.7 244 ( 66.7 ) 122 ( 33.3 )
Race/ethnicity
White 2277 79.3 1273 ( 55.9 ) 1004 ( 44.1 ) 0.0003
Hispanic 207 7.2 92 ( 44.4 ) 115 ( 55.6 )
Black 248 8.6 120 ( 48.4 ) 128 ( 51.6 )
Other 139 4.8 89 ( 64.0 ) 50 ( 36.0 )
Marital status
Married 1294 45.1 669 ( 51.7 ) 625 ( 48.3 ) 0.005
Not married 1370 47.7 794 ( 58.0 ) 576 ( 42.0 )
Unknown 207 7.2 111 ( 53.6 ) 96 ( 46.4 )
Education level
1st quartilec 702 24.5 414 ( 59.0 ) 288 ( 41.0 ) <.0001
2nd quartile 690 24 413 ( 59.9 ) 277 ( 40.1 )
3rd quartile 673 23.4 361 ( 53.6 ) 312 ( 46.4 )
4th quartile 769 26.8 368 ( 47.9 ) 401 ( 52.1 )
Unknown 37 1.3 18 ( 48.6 ) 19 ( 51.4 )
Income level
1st quartiled 722 25.1 361 ( 50.0 ) 361 ( 50.0 ) 0.004
2nd quartile 682 23.8 379 ( 55.6 ) 303 ( 44.4 )
3rd quartile 691 24.1 384 ( 55.6 ) 307 ( 44.4 )
4th quartile 682 23.8 406 ( 59.5 ) 276 ( 40.5 )
Unknown 94 3.3 44 ( 46.8 ) 50 ( 53.2 )
Year of cancer diagnosis
2007 468 16.3 234 ( 50.0 ) 234 ( 50.0 ) 0.11
2008 553 19.3 307 ( 55.5 ) 246 ( 44.5 )
2009 576 20.1 311 ( 54.0 ) 265 ( 46.0 )
2010 589 20.5 343 ( 58.2 ) 246 ( 41.8 )
2011 685 23.9 379 ( 55.3 ) 306 ( 44.7 )
Tumor gradee
I 381 13.3 216 ( 56.7 ) 165 ( 43.3 ) 0.64
II 1132 39.4 606 ( 53.5 ) 526 ( 46.5 )
III 835 29.1 465 ( 55.7 ) 370 ( 44.3 )
IV 151 5.3 88 ( 58.3 ) 63 ( 41.7 )
Unknown 372 13 199 ( 53.5 ) 173 ( 46.5 )
Tumor size
≤10 mm 1130 39.4 624 ( 55.2 ) 506 ( 44.8 ) 0.46
>10mm 952 33.2 532 ( 55.9 ) 420 ( 44.1 )
Unknown 789 27.5 418 ( 53.0 ) 371 ( 47.0 )
Surgery and radiation treatment
LRT 1601 55.8 727 ( 45.4 ) 874 ( 54.6 ) <.0001
Lumpectomy 583 20.3 391 ( 67.1 ) 192 ( 32.9 )
Mastectomy 687 23.9 456 ( 66.4 ) 231 ( 33.6 )
Charlson comorbidity score
0 1810 63 978 ( 54.0 ) 832 ( 46.0 ) 0.28
1 664 23.1 364 ( 54.8 ) 300 ( 45.2 )
>1 397 13.8 232 ( 58.4 ) 165 ( 41.6 )
Cancer registry
Connecticut 137 4.8 70 ( 51.1 ) 67 ( 48.9 ) <.0001
Detroit 123 4.3 52 ( 42.3 ) 71 ( 57.7 )
Hawaii 23 0.8 12 ( 52.2 ) 11 ( 47.8 )
Iowa 199 6.9 114 ( 57.3 ) 85 ( 42.7 )
New Mexico 35 1.2 23 ( 65.7 ) 12 ( 34.3 )
Seattle 121 4.2 86 ( 71.1 ) 35 ( 28.9 )
Utah 46 1.6 22 ( 47.8 ) 24 ( 52.2 )
Kentucky 159 5.5 88 ( 55.3 ) 71 ( 44.7 )
Louisiana 130 4.5 53 ( 40.8 ) 77 ( 59.2 )
New Jersey 373 13 215 ( 57.6 ) 158 ( 42.4 )
Texas 468 16.3 244 ( 52.1 ) 224 ( 47.9 )
Georgia 318 11.1 152 ( 47.8 ) 166 ( 52.2 )
California 739 25.7 443 ( 59.9 ) 296 ( 40.1 )

Abbreviations: AI, aromatase inhibitor; LRT, lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy.

a

Row percentages for each stratum are shown.

b

P values for age, education level, income level, year of cancer diagnosis, tumor grade, and tumor size were determined with the Cochran-Armitage trend test; other P values were determined with the chi-square test.

c

Highest percentage of residents who graduated from high school

d

Highest median household income

e

Grade I is well differentiated, grade II is moderately differentiated, grade III is poorly differentiated, and grade IV is undifferentiated.