Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;20(2):155–165. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2017.8241

Table 1.

Comparisons of total and differential WBC count in asthma (A) groups treated with three concentrations of Curcuma longa (CL, 0.75, 1.50, and 3.00 mg/ml) and curcumin (Cu, 0.15, 0.30, and 0.60 mg/ml)

Substances Total WBC (Cunt/ml) Eosinophil (Percentage) Neutrophil (Percentage) Lymphocyte (Percentage) Monocyte (Percentage)
A+CL 0.75 8400.00±452.37 6.00±0.46 24.00±1.61 63.00±1.82 7.00±0.38
A+CL 1. 50 7806.25±303.17 1.75±0.49 23.00±1.30 69.75±2.08 5.50±0.19
+++ +++
A+CL 3.00 7025.00±412.64 1.26±0.16 22.00±2.03 73.87±2.47 2.87±0.29
+ +++ ++ +++
A+Cu 0.15 6207.14±415.68 2.85±0.63 23.85±2.08 68.87±0.80 4.43±0.48
** *** ***
A+Cu 0.30 6042.86±263.32 2.28±0.56 22.29±0.80 72.43±1.46 3.00±0.31
* ***
A+Cu 0.60 5471.43±426.20 0.57±0.30 19.71±1.90 77.57±2.58 2.15±0.40
+ ++ *** ++

Data were presented as mean±SEM

Comparison of CL vs Cu:* P<0.05, **P<0.01, *** P<0.001 using unpaired t test

Comparison of CL 3.00 and CL 1.50 vs CL 0.75:+ P<0.05, ++ P<0.01, +++ P<0.001 using ANOVA test

Comparison of Cu 0.60 and Cu 0.30 vs Cu 0.15:+ P<0.05, ++ P<0.01, +++ P<0.001 using ANOVA test

Comparison of CL 3.00 vs CL 1.50:# P<0.05, ## P<0.01, ### P<0.001 using ANOVA test

Comparison of Cu 0.60 vs Cu 0.30:#P<0.05, ## P<0.01, ### P<0.001 using ANOVA test