Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;20(2):155–165. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2017.8241

Table 2.

Comparisons of various oxidant and antioxidant variables in in asthma (A) groups treated with three concentrations of Curcuma longa (CL, 0.75, 1.50, and 3.00 mg/ml) and curcumin (Cu, 0.15, 0.30, and 0.60 mg/ml)

Substances NO2 (µM) NO3 (µM) MDA (nM) SOD (U/ml) CAT (U/ml) Thiol (µM)
A+CL 0.75 4.22±0.09 24.24±0.99 0.99±0.04 0.01±0.002 0.01±0.002 0.05±0.01
A+CL 1. 50 3.90±0.09 19.77±0.42 0.70±0.04 0.03±0.002 0.03±0.003 0.09±0.00
+ ++ +++ +++ +++ +
A+CL 3.00 3.30±0.08 16.73±0.88 0.43±0.03 0.06±0.001 0.08±0.001 0.20±0.01
+++ ### +++ # +++ ### +++ ### +++ ### +++ ###
A+Cu 0.15 3.60±0.08 20.25±0.42 0.92±0.04 0.03±0.003 0.02±0.002 0.07±0.00
*** ** **
A+Cu 0.30 3.41±0.10 17.99±0.50 0.68±0.03 0.04±0.002 0.04±0.002 0.12±0.01
** + +++ ++ +++ +
A+Cu 0.60 3.07±0.10 14.34±0.49 0.36±0.01 0.07±0.002 0.09±0.002 0.25±0.01
++ +++ ### +++ ### *** +++ ### +++ ### * +++ ###

Data were presented as mean±SEM

Comparison of CL vs Cu: *P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 using unpaired t test

Comparison of CL 3.00 and CL 1.50 vs CL 0.75:+ P<0.05, ++ P<0.01, +++ P<0.001 using ANOVA test

Comparison of Cu 0.60 and Cu 0.30 vs Cu 0.15: + P<0.05, ++P<0.01, +++ P<0.001 using ANOVA test

Comparison of CL 3.00 vs CL 1.50: # P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ### P<0.001 using ANOVA test

Comparison of Cu 0.60 vs Cu 0.30: # P<0.05, ## P<0.01, ### P<0.001 using ANOVA test