Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 7;7:44213. doi: 10.1038/srep44213

Table 2. Surface roughness parameters and surface area differences of the Ti samples.

Materials Optical profilometry
AFM
Ra (nm) Rq (nm) Rmax (μm) Surface area difference (%)
As-received 27 ± 2 34 ± 3 0.4 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.01
eCG 146 ± 8 190 ± 10 2.5 ± 0.3 2.35 ± 0.6
eFG 91 ± 8 125 ± 11 2 ± 0.2 1.38 ± 0.4
eUFG 209 ± 15***,†,‡ 279 ± 20***,†,‡ 3.2 ± 0.1***,‡,** 3.37 ± 1*

Ra is the average roughness of the absolute value of the profile height; Rq is the root mean square roughness of surface; Rmax is the height of the highest peak in the roughness profile. * if p < 0.05, and *** if p < 0.001 compare with the as-received substrate; ** if p < 0.01, and if p < 0.001 with respect to the eCG substrates; and p < 0.001 compared to the eFG substrates. There is no statistically significant difference in surface area difference between the eUFG, eFG, and eCG.