Table 1. P-value comparison of methods in Sabatti et al. (2009) and this paper on LDL.

	Sabatti et al.	Univariate	Multivariate	EM
rs646776	$2.19\times {10}^{-12}$	$8.08\times {10}^{-8}$	$1.17\times {10}^{-8}$	$1.11\times {10}^{-9}$
rs4844614	$2.38\times {10}^{-7}$	$8.89\times {10}^{-7}$	$1.61\times {10}^{-7}$	$1.02\times {10}^{-8}$
rs673548	-	$6.50\times {10}^{-5}$	$5.07\times {10}^{-5}$	$7.60\times {10}^{-7}$

For significantly associated SNPs, EM adds power. rs673548 was not reported for LDL in Sabatti et al. (2009) but reported a nearby SNP (rs693) which is in high LD and has a P-value of ${2.99}^{-11}.$ rs673548 was reported for TG.