Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):e0170955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170955

Table 3. Stratified analyses of pooled relative risks (95% CI) of AF for HbA1c levels as categorical variable.

Stratified analyses No. of studies Pooled RR(95% CI) Heterogeneity test
P value I2(%)
style
prospective 6 1.09(1.00,1.18) 0.37 6.70%
retrospective 1 0.37(0.20,0.67) . .
Country
America 4 1.09(1.01,1.17) 0.44 0.00%
Not America 3 0.57(0.18,1.77) 0.03 72.30%
Publication year
before 2011 2 0.73(0.12,4.59) 0.10 62.20%
After 2012 5 0.99(0.83,1.18) <0.01 73.20%
Sample size
<3000 3 0.57(0.18,1.77) 0.03 72.30%
≥3000>ze7H耂
≥96m>ez7I耂
≥6>ez71.13(1.09,1.18)J耀1.13(1.09,1.18)70.
4 1.09(1.01,1.17) 0.44 0.00%
Follow-up duration
<96m 3 0.95(0.56,1.63) 0.24 29.70%
≥96m>ez7I耂
≥6>ez71.13(1.09,1.18)J耀
1.13(1.09,1.18)70.83(
3 1.10(1.02,1.19) 0.48 0.00%
age
<63y 5 0.99(0.83,1.18) <0.01 73.20%
≥63y 2 0.73(0.12,4.59) 0.10 62.20%
quintiles
2 3 0.95(0.56,1.63) 0.24 29.70%
3 2 0.68(0.22,2.11) <0.01 92.60%
4 2 1.05(0.95,1.17) 0.96 0.00%
prime effect size
OR 1 0.37(0.20,0.67) . .
RR 3 0.95(0.56,1.63) 0.24 29.70%
HR 3 1.10(1.02,1.19) 0.48 0.00%
Adjustment for CABG
Yes 1 1.49(0.61,3.64) . .
No 6 0.98(0.82,1.17) <0.01 70.70%
Study quality
<6 4 0.69(0.35,1.36) 0.02 71.00%
≥6 3 1.10(1.02,1.19) 0.48 0.00%

Note: I2 is interpreted as the proportion of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting.