Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 31;41(3):198–209. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22021

Table III.

Analysis results for testing rare variant effects on ALT and AST using univariate SKAT, TATES and MAASS for rare variants with different filtering options.

GPT PCDHGB1 ZNF620
MAF ≤1% MAC ≥2 Discovery for 13,317 genes (cut off : 3.75E-06) # of SNPs 3 3 4
ALT 5.51E-03 3.17E-02 3.52E-01
AST 4.70E-01 8.32E-05 3.98E-06
TATES 8.88E-03 1.34E-04 6.42E-06
Homo-M 7.59E-01 1.77E-04 8.02E-05
Hetero-M 2.84E-06 4.90E-04 9.80E-08
replication # of SNPs 2 14 -
Homo-M 1.00E+00 9.47E-01 -
Hetero-M 9.96E-01 7.97E-01 -
MAC ≥3 Discovery for 11,348 genes (cut off : 4.41E-06) # of SNPs - 2 4
ALT - 3.30E-02 3.52E-01
AST - 8.45E-05 3.98E-06
TATES - 1.36E-04 6.42E-06
Homo-M - 2.55E-04 8.02E-05
Hetero-M - 5.99E-04 9.80E-08
replication # of SNPs - 14 -
Homo-M - 9.47E-01 -
Hetero-M - 7.97E-01 -
MAC ≥4 Discovery for 9,818 genes (cut off : 5.09E-06) # of SNPs - 2 -
ALT - 3.30E-02 -
AST - 8.45E-05 -
TATES - 1.36E-04 -
Homo-M - 2.55E-04 -
Hetero-M - 5.99E-04 -
replication # of SNPs - 14 -
Homo-M - 9.47E-01 -
Hetero-M - 7.97E-01 -
MAF ≤5% MAC ≥2 Discovery for 13,731 genes (cut off : 3.64E-06) # of SNPs 3 6 4
ALT 5.51E-03 1.44E-03 3.52E-01
AST 4.70E-01 3.62E-06 3.98E-06
TATES 8.88E-03 5.83E-06 6.42E-06
Homo-M 7.59E-01 4.00E-06 8.02E-05
Hetero-M 2.84E-06 2.06E-05 9.80E-08
replication # of SNPs 2 25 -
Homo-M 1.00E+00 4.12E-01 -
Hetero-M 9.96E-01 9.50E-02 -
MAC ≥3 Discovery for 12,139 genes (cut off : 4.12E-06) # of SNPs - 5 4
ALT - 1.48E-03 3.52E-01
AST - 4.01E-06 3.98E-06
TATES - 6.46E-06 6.42E-06
Homo-M - 4.26E-06 8.02E-05
Hetero-M - 1.77E-05 9.80E-08
replication # of SNPs - 25 -
Homo-M - 4.12E-01 -
Hetero-M - 9.50E-02 -
MAC ≥4 Discovery for 10,954 genes (cut off : 4.56E-06) # of SNPs - 5 -
ALT - 1.48E-03 -
AST - 4.01E-06 -
TATES - 6.46E-06 -
Homo-M - 4.26E-06 -
Hetero-M - 1.77E-05 -
replication # of SNPs - 25 -
Homo-M - 4.12E-01 -
Hetero-M - 9.50E-02 -

Five genes had at least one significant result using the four methods at the Bonferroni significance level. The significant results are shown in bold for each Bonferroni cutoff.