Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2016 Nov 7;123(6):1027–1034. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30412

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratio of receipt of definitive treatment, surgery, and perceived quality of health care for men who obtained a second opinion compared to men who did not obtain a second opinion, overall and by the specific reason for obtaining a second opinion

Outcomes (Odds Ratio; 95% Confidence Interval)*
Receipt of definitive treatment Receipt of surgery among men who received definitive treatment Perceived quality of prostate cancer care
Obtained second opinion
No Ref Ref Ref
Yes 0.95 (0.84-1.08) 1.11 (0.94-1.30) 1.04 (0.90-1.19)
Reason for obtaining second opinion (with not obtaining second opinion as the reference group) **
    Wanted more information about my cancer 0.89 (0.68-1.19) 1.70 (1.24-2.34) 0.83 (0.64-1.08)
    Wanted the best doctor 0.91 (0.67-1.22) 2.46 (1.72-3.51) 1.00 (0.76-1.33)
    Encouraged by family/friends 0.64 (0.46-0.89) 2.25 (1.49-3.39) 0.75 0.55-1.03)
    Wanted information about treatment not offered by initial doctor 0.94 (0.64-1.36) 1.33 (0.91-1.96) 0.70 (0.49-0.99)
    Dissatisfaction with initial doctor 0.49 (0.32-0.73) 1.51 (0.84-2.72) 0.84 (0.55-1.28)
    Other 0.79 (0.55-1.13) 1.11 (0.71-1.75) 1.16 (0.79-1.69)
*

Separate models were constructed for obtaining second opinions overall, and for each specific reason for obtaining a second opinion with not obtaining a second opinion as the reference group. All models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, marital status), clinical factors (10-year mortality risk, clinical tumor stage, Gleason score), and visit to radiation oncologist

**

Respondents were able to select more than one reason

Bold indicates statistical significance at p<0.05