Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Apr 15;74(5):499–507. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001257

Table 1.

Participant flow and primary and secondary outcomes: New York, NY, 2012–2015

Three Seek-Test Approaches
1
RDS-CTT (N=3005)
2
RDS-AST (N=484)
3
VBS (N=403)
CTT vs. AST
Risk Ratio 95% CI
CTT vs. AST
p-value
CTT vs. VBS
Risk Ratio 95% CI
CTT vs. VBS
p-value
AST vs. VBS
Risk Ratio 95% CI
AST vs. VBS
p-value
Primary outcome
 Confirmed newly diagnosed HIV-infection A 29
1.0%
14
4.0%
2
0.3%
0.26 (0.08–3.60) 0.06 3.84 (1.05–11.36) 0.03 14.89 (1.01–48.18) <.01
Secondary outcomes
 Screened for eligibility 5057 661 565
 Found eligible B 3445
66.3%
525
79.1%
428
71.5%
0.84 (0.78–0.90) <.01 0.93 (0.84–1.03) 0.17 1.11 (0.98–1.25) 0.09
 Enrolled into the study and completed baseline interview C 3005
83.3%
484
87.4%
403
92.6%
0.95 (0.88–1.04) 0.26 0.90 (0.85–0.96) <.01 0.94 (0.86–1.03) 0.20
 Offered HIV testing D 2380
78.9%
484
100%
403
100%
 Accepted HIV testing/tested E 2297
96.7%
477
97.8%
385
97.1%
0.99 (0.96–1.01) 0.36 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 0.70 1.01 (0.98–1.04) 0.60
 Overall HIV prevalence (previously and newly diagnosed) F 140
7.4%
28
10.3%
2
0.3%
0.72 (0.39–1.84) 0.40 27.34 (10.36–75.86) <.01 38.08 (10.77–112.20) <.01
A

- Among tested

B

- Among screened

C

- Among eligible

D

- Among enrolled with baseline interview

E

- Among offered testing

F

- Among tested and previously diagnosed