Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 8;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0226-4

Table 2.

Results from linear or logistic regression of distance to roads on markers of cardiac structure in JHS (N = 4826)a

Distance to A1 or A2 road <150 m (n = 103) 150–299 m (n = 158) 300–999 m (n = 1156) ≥1000 m (n = 3409) Log-transformed distance to A1 or A2 road (continuous)
 LVMI, g/m2.7, beta (95% CI) 1.3
(−0.9, 3.6)
−0.7
(−2.5, 1.1)
−0.3
(−1.1, 0.4)
REF −0.01
(−0.3, 0.3)
 LV hypertrophy, OR (95% CI)b 1.59
(0.88, 2.90)
0.73
(0.37, 1.42)
0.77
(0.58, 1.03)
REF 0.98
(0.88, 1.09)
 LV end-diastolic diameter, mm, beta (95% CI) 0.7
(−0.2, 1.5)
−0.03
(−0.7, 0.7)
0.1
(−0.2, 0.4)
REF −0.06
(−0.2, 0.06)
 LV end-systolic diameter, mm, beta (95% CI) 1.2
(0.2, 2.1)*
−0.05
(−0.8, 0.7)
0.008
(−0.3, 0.3)
REF −0.1
(−0.2, 0.03)
Distance to A1 road <150 m
(n = 34)
150–299 m (n = 93) 300–999 m
(n = 793)
≥1000 m (n = 3906) Log-transformed distance to A1 road (continuous)
 LVMI, g/m2.7, beta (95% CI) 3.6
(−0.3, 7.4)
0.0
(−2.3, 2.3)
−0.06
(−0.9, 0.8)
REF −0.2
(−0.6, 0.2)
 LV hypertrophy, OR (95% CI)b 1.21
(0.44, 3.31)
0.82
(0.35, 1.94)
0.89
(0.64, 1.23)
REF 0.97
(0.85, 1.10)
 LV end-diastolic diameter, mm, beta (95% CI) 1.7
(0.2, 3.2)*
0.09
(−0.8, 1.0)
0.03
(−0.3, 0.4)
REF −0.08
(−0.2, 0.06)
 LV end-systolic diameter, mm, beta (95% CI) 2.0
(0.4, 3.7)*
−0.08
(−1.1, 0.9)
0.04
(−0.3, 0.4)
REF −0.08
(−0.2, 0.08)

aModels adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, alcohol consumption, education level, occupation, neighborhood socioeconomic status z-score, type of medical insurance, and smoking status

bLV hypertrophy was modeled using logistic regression; all other models use linear regression

*p < 0.05