Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 7;17:70. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0913-3

Table 3.

Highly supported Italian clusters identified in the MCC tree obtained from the complete dataset

Sample size
(number of strains)
Tree root support
(posterior probability)
Presence of Q80K (N, %) Time span
(years)
Regional information
Cluster 1 2 1 0 (0) 2.23 Unknown: 2
Cluster 2 2 1 0 (0) 3.4 North: 1 – South: 1
Cluster 3 2 1 2 (100) 8.4 Unknown: 2
Cluster 4 2 1 2 (100) 15.0 Central: 2
Cluster 5 2 1 0 (0) 17.6 Unknown: 2
Cluster 6 2 0.98 2 (100) 22.8 Unknown: 2
Cluster 7 2 0.99 0 (0) 32.3 Unknown: 2
Cluster 8 2 0.97 0 (0) 32.8 Central: 1 – Unknown: 1
Cluster 9 2 0.92 0 (0) 33.1 Unknown: 2
Cluster 10 5 0.99 0 (0) 13.9 Unknown: 5
Cluster 11 6 1 0 (0) 12.6 Central: 1 – Unknown: 5
Cluster 12 7 1 0 (0) 7.8 Central: 6 – Unknown: 1
Cluster 13 34 0.98 3 (8.8) 35.4 North: 2 - Central: 21 - South: 7 – Unknown: 4

In total, 13 highly supported clusters were identified (posterior root node support ≥0.90), with 2 to 34 Italian member taxa. Sampling region information was unavailable for many taxa. For each cluster, the sample size, posterior root node support, presence of Q80K and the time spanned by the cluster, is listed. Clusters are ordered according to sample size and time span