Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 22;228(6):940–951. doi: 10.1111/joa.12459

Table 2.

Observed means and standard deviations for body mass, tibia length and mid‐shaft cross‐sectional geometry in Longshanks and Control tibiae

Body mass (g) Tibia length (mm) CSA (mm2) Polar section modulus (mm3) IR (mm2 mg−2/3)
Longshanks (n = 105) 37.91 (0.56) 19.42 (0.07) 1.32 (0.02) 0.48 (0.01) 2.17 × 10 −5
Control
(= 111) 36.28 (0.58) 17.46 (0.04) 1.29 (0.02) 0.45 (0.01) 2.37 × 10 −5
% Change +4.5% +11.2% +2.1% +5.1% −8.6%

Values in bold are significantly different between the two groups at P = 0.05, as determined using one‐way anova.

CSA, cross‐sectional area; IR, index of robusticity.